Featured
President Jimmy Carter: American Faith and Truth
News & Politics
Opinion: 50 Years of Home Rule
News & Politics
Editorial: A Season of Change
Editorials and Opinions
Editorial: Working Miracles
News & Politics
Editorial: Making Your Own Family ‘Blue Zone’
Tipping Bicycles in Washington, D.C.
July 16, 2014
•They call it the tipping point.
It’s usually what happens when an ongoing process, crisis, unspoken resentment or problem comes to the surface and explodes into reaction. Expressions of rage and anger move from tension into potential tragedy, or as they say on the web, goes viral.
It happened with the country’s long unsolved and intractable immigration issue when a huge influx of immigrants from Central American countries, many of them unaccompanied minors and children, headed north toward the United States and tipped immigration into crisis and tragedy mode.
It appears to be happening with the rumbles and murmurs surrounding the possible impeachment of President Barack Obama, spurred equally by the likes of Sarah Palin, and conservative Republicans and pollsters taking the pulse on such matters. Why Palin should be listened to on matters of public service responsibility is anybody’s guess, given that she resigned her Alaska governship based on such pressing matters as testing the presidential waters and watching her daughter compete on “Dancing With the Stars.” Nevertheless, impeachment talk is getting louder, if not yet at tipping stage.
And it’s happened with bicyclists in Washington, D.C.
Mind you, the big bicycle debate of 2014 is by no stretch of the imagination as compelling as the humanitarian and political drama surrounding the border crossing or talk about impeaching the president of the United States.
But it’s our tipping point here in Washington.
For years, people have noticed the rise in the number of bicycle riders in the streets of Washington, the coming of bike lanes and the omnipresent racks of rental bikes which seem to come in tandem with a major influx of new residents loosely termed “millennials.” With the notice has come resentment from all sorts of people—pedestrians, drivers (taxi drivers especially) and longtime residents feeling the pressure of change.
Recently, the issue suddenly exploded full force with a couple of columns in the Washington Post, one which complained about bikers on pedestrian sidewalks. The other, a characteristically over the top effort by Courtland Milloy, who attacked bicyclists in his usually nuanced way. There followed a rain of letters to the editors many of them pro bike and a demonstration by bicyclists at the Washington Post protesting Milloy’s column.
This much we can say for sure: most bicyclists are law abiding riders. They seem to do only what law enforcement allows, which is not the same thing as obeying laws. Go for a ride through the city in a car and it’s fairly common to see many bicyclists run red lights, stop signs, and ride on sidewalks, ignoring pedestrian right of way strictures. The issue isn’t the bikers here, it’s the lack of enforcement by police or a clearly defined code of the road that bikers might understand.
Bikers will tell you that they are doing good by not adding to the city’s congestion. They are environmentalists at heart, they say. It’s a fair argument, but it’s also a step away from a morally superior sense of entitlement.
Milloy suggested drivers are so irritated they might be inclined to pay the $500 fine that’s in place if a driver hits a bicycle rider. That’s not funny, that’s irresponsible.
Here are two questions for all of us.
Does President Obama ride a bike? And why can’t we all just get along?
Letter to the Editor
July 2, 2014
•Dear Georgetowner,
Thank you for raising the question of how traffic flows on the streets of Georgetown. I am sure everyone who lives here and those who drive on the streets have opinions, including those who do it for a living. Certainly having more one way streets would make driving here easier and with much less property damage to everyone’s automobiles.
Sincerely,
Anne Armstrong Thompson
Marion Barry: His Life, His Way
•
In the summer of 1978, I attended an alley party, a gathering of neighborhood friends on Capitol Hill near the Eastern Market Metro Station. Toward mid-afternoon, there was a buzz of energy in the crowd and you could see a thirty-forty-something black man in a summer suit making his way through the people, shaking hands, announcing himself. “Who’s that guy?,” I asked a friend. He came our way and stretched out his hand. “Hello,” he said. “I’m Marion Barry, and I’m running for mayor of Washington.” He looked me straight in the eye, no blinking, straight up.
Back then, not even Barry—who is neither humble, modest nor shy about his achievements and talents—had any idea of just how far he would go, how much of an impact he would have on his adoptive city, for better or worse, just how far he might rise and how low he might fall, or how much he would seep into the lasting imagination of the city’s residents, black and white.
Some 36 years later, here we were again. He walked into the Four Seasons Hotel in Georgetown, and at first glance—walking carefully, but straight up, splendid gray suit and tie—he still had some of that charisma that makes you pay attention. But he was also, at age 78, a little diminished—by health issues and by time.
But we were all here together because of the book.
There is no end to the story of Marion Barry, or as the title of his book goes “Mayor for Life, The Incredible Story of Marion Barry Jr.”
The book—long anticipated and long put off—is what it’s all about now in Barry’s life: interviews, an appearance at the National Press Club, an unusual sit-down, “on-the-record” dinner with journalists at the Look Supper Club on K Street, a forum cum-love fest sponsored by the Washington Informer at the Congress Heights school on Martin Luther King Avenue in Ward 8, all part of a here-there-and-everywhere mini-book tour. The book getting its share of knocks from the media, and others, but also praise from fans. Wherever Barry goes, his story goes with him.
If you’ve lived in the Barry age, you get instant flashbacks encountering him. You remember the flamboyant first-time mayoral candidate, the politician in the dashiki, the job-maker for the city’s struggling African-American population, presiding over a construction boom, charming some but not all CAG members at their meetings; the infamous crack-smoking Vista Hotel tapes, the trial, coming back from a six-month prison sentence, getting re-elected to a fourth mayoral term, getting elected to the Ward 8 council seat, where he remains to this day, still drawing attention, still getting into trouble, still a force.
The book tour is bringing out almost every Barry incarnation we’ve seen—as well as the familiar tropes in reaction to the book by his critics. Modesty is never an issue. At the book dinner he said, “Courage, tenacity and vision, that’s Marion Barry in a nutshell.”
Face to face over lunch, he’s a little quieter, although no less full of certainty. “I don’t want my life to be just about the Vista thing, it was a life of accomplishment, where I helped people get a fair share of what they’ve been denied, in terms of jobs, in terms of work, in terms of participating in the business of this city. When I came here in 1965, this was still a sleepy Southern town. It was segregated, and black people weren’t a part of the economy the way they should have been, and when I was elected mayor I changed all that.” Asked if he had any regrets, he almost scowls. “Sure, of course, I’ve got regrets, who doesn’t,” he says. “When it comes to that, I sure wouldn’t have gone up to that hotel room if I had to do it over.”
The book is a kind of freight train, going full speed around the curves, dropping cargo and information, with some empty cars on it. If you want Vista, it’s there in detail, according to Barry, if not according to other accounts and observers, often graphically.
But the book, written with novelist Omar Tyree, does touch on his early years, where you get a better sense of what may have formed Barry. He was born in Itta Bena, Mississippi. “I grew up poor,” he will tell you. His father was a sharecropper who died when Barry was four. “I didn’t have a role model,” he said.
He grew up in Mississippi, in Arkansas, in Tennessee, during his formative years. Those were also the years of real segregation and Jim Crow in the south, where blacks and whites drank at different water fountains were. “I tried it once, I wanted to see what it was like to drink water from the white fountain,” he says. “You just didn’t do that.”
In the end, Marion Barry became his own role model. Barry pursued science, has a master’s degree in Chemistry and became an organizer and leader of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) during some of the most dramatic years of the civil rights movement.
“My mother [Mattie Cummings] picked cotton, but she later became a domestic. She insisted to the people who she worked for that she would come in the front door, not the back door. She said to them “If I’m good enough to teach and raise your kids then I’m good enough to come through the front door. And she did.”
His vision about himself is heroic, in terms of the difference he made in the city for its black residents. “I knew what needed to be done and I did it,” he says. From the moment he came to town as a SNCC organizer with the reputation of a go-getter and firebrand, he kept moving forward. “People liked me, people followed me. I ran for the school board and won, I ran for the city council and won, I ran for mayor and won.”
“You want to know why I came back after all that, I was on the council again, but I went to Safeway on Naylor Road, to get some groceries, and I couldn’t get out of there for two hours. It’s true.” People said, “why don’t you run again, Marion? The city, the people need you. So I ran,” he says. That was his last mayoral run, in 1994, when he beat both Council member John Ray and Mayoral incumbent Sharon Pratt Kelly, who ran a distant third. That was also, after his victory, when he told disgruntled white voters “to get over it.”
The segregated South framed Barry’s political context. In the book and in conversation, he often refers to white folks and the white establishment as a kind of political antagonist, against himself and African-Americans in general.
He is asked about Mayor Vincent Gray’s campaign platform of “One City,” of bringing the city together racially and ethnically. “It’s not real,” he says. “Can’t be done. It’s just not real. It’s a slogan, that’s all, a pipe dream.” Barry endorsed Gray in the Democratic primary earlier this year, in which Gray, operating under a cloud, was beaten by Ward 4 Council member Muriel Bowser. Barry said he’ll be supporting Bowser.
Talking about the new demographics of the city and its neighborhoods in which the black population is declining, he says it’s “gentrification, pure and simple, that’s driving people out of the city, the people who made up the backbone of this city. It’s a disgrace. ”
“I’m not done,” he said. “I’m going to continue fight for economic empowerment. If you don’t have capital, you don’t have power.” [gallery ids="101797,140715,140713" nav="thumbs"]
Who Stands for D.C. Statehood Now?
•
Todd Purdum has written a highly interesting and compelling book chronicling the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Its title is “An Idea Whose Time Has Come.”
Right here in D.C., we have an “idea” which seems far from becoming a reality: D.C. statehood.
As we celebrate our nation’s birthday, once again we should be reminded that citizens of D.C. do not enjoy the same rights as every other American.
This is very sad. Because at no time has the dream of D.C. becoming the 51st state seemed so poised for a stunning launch. Way back in November 1993, there was a vote on D.C. statehood in the House of Representatives. It received 153 votes. There never was a vote in the Senate. (Even with Jesse Jackson being the elected D.C. Statehood Senator.)
Today, the picture is far different. The D.C. Statehood Bill was introduced in January 2013 by Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del. The bill goes to his committee — Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. Being the committee chair, he is in charge. He determines the scheduling of hearings and the mark-up of the bill. Simply put, the bill is his to move or not to move. And this is the crucial point, Carper has not moved his own bill.
Two members of Carper’s own committee – Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., and Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska — have personally told me they will vote for the bill. The other Democratic senators Carl Levin of Michigan, Claire McCaskill of Missouri, Jon Tester of Montana, Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin and Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota have not stated their position.
The key senator on the committee is Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark. He is considered to be the most endangered Democrat incumbent in the Senate. Pryor has not stated his view on this subject. I have even contacted his father David Pryor, the former house member, senator and governor. No response.
Before I go further, one important person is strangely silent on this issue: the President of the United States, Barack Obama. Not a single word. Not one utterance. He obviously thinks his policy of taking us for granted will go unnoticed and unpunished.
So far, he is right.
Our local elected officials are even worse. With the notable exception of Ward 3 Councilmember Mary Cheh, no one has raised their voice.
District Council Chair Phil Mendelson should be pointed out for his indifference and appalling lack of leadership. Right now, it looks like Sen. Carper will not act until after the November elections.
The time is now, before the November election. The entire Democratic leadership is a co-sponsor of the bill – along with three of D.C.’s neighboring senators (Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin of Maryland and Tim Kaine of Virginia). Senator Harry Reid, the Majority Leader, told me he “would make it happen.” Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton is no help. She sits idly by and refuses to talk to Democratic senators on the committee. This is a stunning case of incumbent malfeasance.
There are a few politicians who have spoken up in support of statehood for D.C. MaryEva Candon, the National Committeewoman from D.C., and Arrington Dixon, the National Committeeman, have been vigorous in contacting their counterparts in the National Democratic party. They are to be applauded for these efforts.
The citizenry of D.C. must act and raise the visibility of this issue. If we the vote-less and second class citizens don’t care, no one else will.
Mark Plotkin is a political analyst and contributor to the BBC on American politics.
Letter to the Editor
•
As someone who lives on 29th Street between Olive and M, I cannot disagree strenuously enough with your editorial calling for 28th and 29th to be turned into one-way streets. There is no doubt that traffic flow in the area results in damaged mirrors, but “solving this problem” – which I would argue, having suffered a couple of these incidents myself, is just an unfortunate reality of street parking in an urban area – in this manner will only exacerbate a bigger one.
My mirrors notwithstanding, I am far more concerned about the threat to life and limb posed by the reckless driving that routinely occurs on both 28th and 29th with cars traveling far in excess of the speed limit and barreling through stop signs without regard to the signs themselves or pedestrians that are in the crosswalks. It is simply a matter of time before we witness a terrible tragedy as things currently stand. Removing oncoming traffic as an obstacle to these wannabe Mario Andretti’s would take away the one thing that actually forces them to slow down.
The mirror problem is also a reckless driving problem and the way to address this issue is straightforward: actually enforce existing traffic regulations by issuing tickets to violators. The word would get out.
Matthew Perl
Georgetown Tobacco Imperiled by New Tax
June 30, 2014
•To the Editor:
I am the owner of Georgetown Tobacco, a store I established in 1964 and now celebrating our 50th year. I would like to be in business for many more years. However, I and the owners of Curtis W. Draper established in 1880 and Signature cigars in Washington are faced with the most serious threat imagined.
In January of this year, the D.C. Tax Revision Commission approved tax reform measures “to increase fairness, broaden D.C.’s tax base, promote competitiveness, encourage business growth and simplify the tax code”.
As a result of the commissions recommendations, the D.C. Council has approved yesterday a tax of 7 million in option #5 of Bill B20 750. This 7 million was calculated out thin air as a line item guess but we are now faced with the reality that if this tax is finally approved at the June 11 District Council meeting, my company and the others small businesses would be forced to close our doors.
The tax raises all tobacco products to the level of cigarettes which is 80 percent of the wholesale cost, as an example, a cigar that retails for $5.00 in Washington will have to sell for $9.00, two-ounce package of pipe tobacco would increase the same along with all other tobacco products. In Virginia, there is a 10-percent tobacco products tax, and in Maryland it is 15 percent of the wholesale.
We are also faced with stiff competition from discount mail order firms across the nation, which offer many of the same products with no tax. In addition to the tax on sales the probability of a floor tax on products we now own could be beyond any of our abilities to pay. The tax, if finally approved, would go into effect Jan. 1, 2015, at the latest. Georgetown Tobacco and others like me will not be in business then.
— David Berkebile, president of Georgetown Tobacco
Post script to editor, re: tobacco tax — At press time it has been discovered that the tax exemption for premium cigars is back in the 2015 budget, and its removal was done by a drafting error. Therefore the 80-percent tax will apply to pipe tobacco, small premium cigars, cigarettes and rolling tobacco and snus. Georgetown Tobacco is hopeful that pipe tobacco and small premium cigars may be exempted as well for our customers of 50 years.
2 School Principals Leaving
•
Principals in two of Georgetown’s public schools will be stepping down at the end of the school year.
Dana Nerenberg, the principal of Hyde-Addison Elementary school, announced that she will be stepping down as principal after eight years of service to the school at 3219 O St., NW.
In a recent letter sent out to Hyde-Addison families and community, Nerenberg expressed her gratitude for the time she spent at Hyde-Addison.
“During this time, I have had the opportunity to form relationships with your children and families, work with amazing teachers and staff, and lead the development of a learning community for children and adults,” Nerenberg said.
Nerenberg also applauded Hyde-Addison Elementary School staff for the consistent effort that they put to work every day.
“We have a truly exceptional staff,” Nerenberg said. “A living and rigorous curriculum, a clear vision, mission and charge, and plenty of work to do in service of our amazing students.”
Nerenberg said that she will be leaving the city to join her fiancé in Portland, Oreg.
Rory Pullens, 56, principal of Duke Ellington School of the Arts, has announced his departure to Los Angeles, where he will be the head of a performing arts school for the Los Angeles Unified School District, the nation’s second largest school system.
Pullens has served as head of Ellington since late 2006, when he came to D.C. from the Denver School of the Arts where he first designed the elementary-level arts school for the public school system. Ellington is located at 3500 R St., NW.
It has been revealed to the L.A. Times that Pullens will receive a salary of $147,086 on a one-year contract plus $10,000 moving allowance.
Previously, Pullens had accepted the job in Los Angeles twice, but backed out later. One time due to a family crisis, and the second time Ellington managed to retain him to stay.
According to the job description, Pullens will direct the entire arts program for the school “to ensure increased arts … opportunities” and to integrate arts into instruction.”
Where the Streets Have No Shame
June 27, 2014
•After moving our offices to the east side of Georgetown, we are happy to have the opportunity to get closer to another part of town. Besides checking out different businesses and meeting other nearby neighbors, this new perspective brings up some questions about east side traffic. Before, we watched cars leaving Georgetown. Now, we see cars entering from downtown.
As we all know, Georgetown can be a mix of obstructions, whether a quick motorcade to the Four Seasons or construction vehicles and tour buses going down the wrong street. There are the multiplying dumpsters for those renovating homes (yet again), meaning more parking spaces lost (yet again). These hulking metal boxes are scattered east to west in town.
Streets are routinely blocked by D.C. Water or Pepco crews redigging, retooling, rewiring thing beneath them. It seemed a crew was renting a place on Olive Street for awhile. Now, they are also at 30th and R Streets and elsewhere.
And those dump trucks: expect to see more of those as Georgetown University, Holy Trinity School and Duke Ellington School rev up their construction projects for the summer. Prospect Street is never short of any kind of vehicle. It seems there’s nothing else to do.
Yet traffic patterns or arrangements are always subject to change. Sometimes, things are turned back to the way they were. Witness the return of the set-up for Wisconsin Avenue in Glover Park. Newly installed traffic lights are trying to rustle vehicles around Washington Circle, while New Hampshire Avenue between M Street and the circle is now a two-way street. A new traffic light at 35th Street and Wisconsin Avenue will slow down traffic and help pedestrians cross the street. It’s a sensible idea, long overdue.
Here is one suggestion from your newcomers to tight 28th Street. As most drivers turn right coming from downtown, make it one-way north. How many more car mirrors must be maimed? Then make 29th Street one-way south, from R Street to M Street. We are looking at 30th and 31st Streets, too. Which one-way should they be? (Remember 30th is already one-way south, from M Street to K Street.)
It is time to rethink some of our streets’ direction. It could be a question of safety, too. Let us know what you think.
For the Love of the Flag: Smithsonian, Hillary Clinton Honor Ralph Lauren
June 20, 2014
•A powerful, emotional slice of America was on display June 17 at a naturalization ceremony at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History and presentation of the James Smithson Bicentennial Medal to designer Ralph Lauren. On hand was Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State and potential 2016 presidential candidate, along with Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson, Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, the Smithsonian’s Wayne Clough and John Gray and Sarah Taylor of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The 15 new Americans — from 15 different countries and 15 for the stars and stripes of the Star-Spangled Banner flag – were told by Johnson that from this point on they could say, “I’m an American, just like you.”
Lauren was cited for his multi-million-dollar contributions to conserve the tattered Star-Spangled Banner, the flag which inspired Georgetowner Francis Scott Key in 1814 to write the national anthem. In the late 1990s, Lauren worked with first lady Hillary Clinton’s Save America’s Treasures. He is “the embodiment of the American spirit,” Clough said.
Clinton cited Lauren’s parents who left Belarus and made a home in the Bronx, N.Y., where the businessman was born. America offers “the freedom to create,” she said. As for the flag, Clinton said Lauren “stepped up” and added that she could not “think of anyone more deserving” of the Smithson Medal.
Lauren spoke of stopping at the Lincoln Memorial the night before and said, “I started with nothing but good parents, a good family.” America gave him the opportunity, he said, and still continues to give him opportunity every day. The work for the Star-Spangled Banner, he said, “came from the heart,” not public relations. Lauren accepted the medal with tears of humility and patriotism. [gallery ids="101771,141195,141197,141182,141187,141190" nav="thumbs"]
Georgetown University’s Unique Place
May 9, 2014
•Here in the oldest neighborhood of Washington, D.C., we have the oldest Catholic institution of higher learning in the United States. Georgetown University is a presence for us beyond our own benefits of wisdom.
To reach its place today, its early leaders had to move past religious persecution in the American colonies, and the school grew along with the new American Republic.
The university’s first student, William Gaston of North Carolina, went on to represent his state in Congress and also assured that the bill to give his college the power to grant degrees was signed by President James Madison.
In 1861, students left the college for the Civil War. President Abraham Lincoln visited the campus, which housed Federal troops. The school colors become blue and gray in 1876 to symbolize the reunion of North and South.
It was in the late 1870s that Georgetown University’s iconic Healy Hall was constructed (it took a while to finish and put a stronger footing, ready for the 20th century).
Its 48th president, John DeGioia, the first layman to lead it, will be its longest-serving one by August. Beginning as a student here, he has 39 years of an “enduring connection.”
“The characteristic spirit of Georgetown is that it’s a place that expects you bring out the best of those around you” — and thus in yourself as well, he told us during an interview for the cover story. We know he meant the university. We also think he was talking about our neighborhood.